Classical Chinese Texts
There were “a hundred schools of thought” in ancient China during the “Warring States period” when Daoism and Confucianism were born. So I have chosen to focus on only those two most important schools and only one each of their respective texts. These texts are the Dao De Jing of Lao Tzu and The Analects of Confucius.
While researching this topic I was fascinated to discover that much of the enigmatic nature of ancient Chinese thought results directly from the classical Chinese language. It is only a written language, since there are so many homonyms in the pronunciation of the pictograms that it would be impossible to tell which pictogram exactly was being referred to from speech alone.
It is also an extremely contextual language, in that the interpretation of each pictogram depends on the relationship with other pictograms in the text.
For example 文 Wen means “to inscribe,” “to embellish.” TIan (天 ) is the world, the universe. The combination 天文 tianwen is “pattern of the heavens”.
Some other, modern Chinese, combinations would be:
- 文 wen “inscribe” 字 zi “character” => “ writing”
- 文 wen “inscribe” 学 “learning” => “literature”
- 文 wen “inscribe” 明 ming “illumination” => “civilization”
- 文 wen “inscribe” 化 hua “transform” => “culture”.
But in a classical text, 文 wen alone might be written for all these things. It was a matter of interpretation to decide if “culture” were the most appropriate or enlightening way in which to read the meaning within the wider context. This could of course mean that a single text could support many different interpretations and it might involve some considerable thought and appeal to personal experience to understand the intention, or intentions, behind the text.
So be comforted, if the following seems difficult to follow, that for millennia it seems likely that all educated Chinese, who read these texts as a matter of course, encountered some kind of similar task.